Designed to Simplify, Accelerate, and Secure

Intel SOA Journal

Subscribe to Intel SOA Journal: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts newslettersWeekly Newsletters
Get Intel SOA Journal: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Intel SOA Journal Authors: Liz McMillan, Elizabeth White, PR.com Newswire, Yeshim Deniz, Bryan O'Rourke

Related Topics: Government News, Intel SOA Journal, Intel Virtualization Journal, SOA & WOA Magazine

Article

Intel Objected to FTC Commissioner

Needless to say, the FTC ignored Intel’s protest

Government News on Ulitzer

The day before the Federal Trade Commission sued Intel for antitrust in December - upsetting the deal Intel thought it had in place to avoid any suit and adding those Nvidia charges - Intel filed a motion objecting to J Thomas Rosch, one of its old outside antitrust lawyers, being one of the three FTC commissioners voting on its fate, especially since he's supposed to be a hardliner dedicated to antitrust enforcement and reportedly the prime mover in the Intel case. Needless to say, the FTC ignored Intel's protest. Intel waited too long, expecting the negotiations to go its way. Given that the FTC's administrative judge found for the FTC in 16 out of 16 cases in the last 27 years, Intel stands little chance of not being convicted come its trial in September. Resigned, Intel is anticipating using the rejection in its appeal.

More Stories By Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.